Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...se negatives among the babies who had been classified as “PASS” by an AABR test. This clearly demonstrated a lack of education and quality control in the p ...n selected prefectures. Every year the results were analysed and the pilot-test area gradually expanded. Small private clinics without appropriate screenin
    4 KB (658 words) - 17:10, 27 August 2014
  • ...se negatives among the babies who had been classified as “PASS” by an AABR test. This clearly demonstrated a lack of education and quality control in the p ...n selected prefectures. Every year the results were analysed and the pilot-test area gradually expanded. Small private clinics without appropriate screenin
    5 KB (679 words) - 10:01, 4 September 2014
  • ...with an OAE test, followed by an ABR test for all infants who fail the OAE test (a two-stage process) (1, 6/9). However, this two-stage process is not limi
    3 KB (426 words) - 11:42, 9 September 2014
  • ...00 cases of permanent childhood deafness detected in one or both ears. The test is optional but 99.8% of parents take up the opportunity. Across England, t ...etter is sent asking the mother to attend an appointment for the screening test; and
    4 KB (597 words) - 17:02, 27 August 2014
  • ...00 cases of permanent childhood deafness detected in one or both ears. The test is optional but 99.8% of parents take up the opportunity. Across England, t ...etter is sent asking the mother to attend an appointment for the screening test; and
    4 KB (618 words) - 10:03, 4 September 2014
  • ...s 1,994 out of which 1,778 were full-term and 216 were premature born. The test passing was higher in the group of full-term babies (92.5%) than in the pre ...was introduced. Thus, the study included all newborns, those with positive test results to be controlled until hearing impairment found or excluded. Most c
    3 KB (472 words) - 12:46, 8 September 2014
  • ..., the infant receives a physical examination and a repeat of the screening test using OAE. Infants who fail this second-stage screening are referred to the
    4 KB (552 words) - 10:43, 18 September 2014
  • ...re first tested a few days after birth and, if they fail, undergo a second test prior to discharge from hospital.
    3 KB (414 words) - 12:08, 8 September 2014
  • ...2–3 days of life, using the Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE) test; all newborns are also analyzed for audiological risk factors. Infants who
    4 KB (494 words) - 11:58, 8 September 2014
  • ...e one of the tests prior to hospital discharge, or who need a second-stage test. Another programme being implemented in Brazil that will be coordinated wit
    4 KB (580 words) - 10:06, 18 September 2014
  • * reduced test costs;
    4 KB (518 words) - 16:59, 27 August 2014
  • ...ars was considered a ‘‘refer’’ result. If a refer result was received, the test was repeated a day later. Neonates failing to pass the repeat TEOAE were re
    4 KB (526 words) - 12:40, 8 September 2014
  • * reduced test costs;
    4 KB (539 words) - 09:47, 4 September 2014
  • ...d nationally to infants in the Netherlands at the age of nine months. This test yielded many false positive results due to temporary conductive hearing los
    4 KB (619 words) - 12:08, 8 September 2014
  • ...hospital or admitted there soon after birth using OAE. Those who fail the test are re-tested after 1 month. Those who fail the second screening are referr # [http://www.eartohear.org/test/screening_report.pdf Kumar, S., and Mohapatra, B. 2010. Status of newborn h
    5 KB (726 words) - 15:21, 18 September 2014